Did Pakistanis Vote for the Status Quo?

Main Article Content

Omer Bin Abdullah

Keywords

Abstract

The latest – and possibly the last – period of military rule in Pakistan


ended in 2008, when elections were held under the thendictator


General Pervez Musharraf. The voting sprouted a


coalition government headed by the Pakistan Peoples Party that


ruled (or rather riled) the country for five excruciating years. The


ever-erring ruling group included the Pakistan Muslim League-


Nawaz, one of the many breakaway wings of the country’s


founding political movement.


The country has suffered ever since the Soviets invaded neighboring


Afghanistan, leading the United States and its allies to fund


the “mujahideen,” the tribal-based loosely organized Muslim


fighters from all over the world. After 9/11, President George W.


Bush’s attack on Afghanistan and hot pursuit of targets inside Pakistan,


not to mention the military dictator Musharraf’s wholesale


willingness to support the United States in all of its decisions, has


led to high levels of violence and instability.


The Pakistani political establishment has little to show for its efforts.


However, another development took root seventeen years ago.


Imran Khan, the internationally respected and loved sports heroturned-


philanthropist, realizing that acts of kindness alone would


not heal the country’s malaise, launched his own political party in


a quest for justice and equality in a society firmly controlled by the


feudal landed class created by the British to rule the Subcontinent.


After ignoring him for some fifteen years, despite his many sacrifices,


the nation finally heard him. But while his popularity boomed


in 2011, his attempt to empower the masses by bringing in “fresh


blood,” namely, young educated people, women, and even the poor


into the assemblies failed. The voters were, as many Pakistanis believe,


deprived of their choice, and thus the same exploitative feudal


class was returned to power. Khan has not fared too well, but at


least he has planted the seeds of inclusive participation. Whether


he can sustain it, however, remains to be seen.

Abstract 134 | PDF Downloads 153