Integrating Kashmir: Modernity, Development and Sedimented Narratives Kashmir in the Aftermath of Partition (By Shahla Hussain) & Colonizing Kashmir: State-Building Under Indian Occupation (By Hafsa Kanjwal)

Main Article Content

Iymon Majid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-1871

Keywords

Colonizing Kashmir, Decolonization, Islam, Kashmir, Modernity

Abstract

How to make sense of the politics and history of Kashmir since decolonization? Two new important books deal with this question and provide a detailed account of what is/was happening in Kashmir—one of the most densely militarized regions in the world with a long history of a self-determination movement. For many years now, and these two books are part of that conversation, scholars have centered Kashmir in their analysis instead of fixating on the dispute between India and Pakistan or the internationalisation of the conflict. This change has brought new perspectives and conceptual categories to study the region. This is a much-needed corrective especially considering that scholarly work on Kashmir has relied on the ‘nation-state’ framework for too long.

Abstract 5 | PDF Downloads 0

References

Endnotes
1 Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford:
Stanford University Press, 2003), 13.
2 Eugen Weber, Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870-1914
(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1976).
3 Neve Gordon, Israel’s Occupation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008).
4 Sumit Ganguly, “Explaining the Kashmir Insurgency: Political Mobilization and
Institutional Decay,” International Security 21, no. 2 (1996): 76–107; Mohita Bhatia and
Reeta Chowdhary Tremblay, eds., Religion and Politics in Jammu and Kashmir (Abingdon,
Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2020); Ashutosh Varshney, “Three Compromised
Problems: Why Kashmir Has Been a Problem,” in Perspectives on Kashmir: The Roots of
Conflict in South Asia, ed. Raju G. C. Thomas (Boulder: Westview Press, 1992), 191–234;
Siddhartha Prakash, “The Political Economy of Kashmir since 1947,” Contemporary
South Asia 9, no. 3 (November 2000): 315–37, https://doi.org/10.1080/713658753; Aijaz
Ashraf Wani, What Happened to Governance in Kashmir (New Delhi: Oxford University
Press, 2019).
5 Mahmood Mamdani, Neither Settler nor Native: The Making and Unmaking of
Permanent Minorities (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press, 2020).
6 Mridu Rai, Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of Kashmir
(Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2004).
7 James C. Scott, Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human
Condition Have Failed, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).
8 Shiv Visvanathan, “The Necessity of Corruption,” Seminar, September 2011, https://
www.india-seminar.com/2011/625/625_shiv_visvanathan.htm#top.
9 Ibid.
10 Navnita Chadha Behera, “The ‘Subaltern Speak’: Can We, the Experts, Listen?,”
International Affairs 99, no. 5 (2023): 1903–27, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad181.
11 Iymon Majid, “Violence and Insurgency in Kashmir: Understanding the
Micropolitics,” India Review 21, no. 4–5 (2022): 592, https://doi.org/10.1080/14736
489.2022.2131126.
12 Mona Bhan, Haley Duschinski, and Deepti Misri, Routledge Handbook of
Critical Kashmir Studies, 1st ed. (London: Routledge, 2022), https://doi.
org/10.4324/9780429330810; Haley Duschinski, Mona Bhan, and Cabeiri deBergh
Robinson, eds., The Palgrave Handbook of New Directions in Kashmir Studies (Cham:
Springer International Publishing, 2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28520-2.
13 Suvir Kaul, “Indian Empire (and the Case of Kashmir),” Economic and Political Weekly
46, no. 13 (2011): 67.